Castle
Siege War, BuildingaPage – Wordpress Out
by
Jacob Malewitz
What
is Castle Siege? Castle Siege is a game I am designing for the last
year. It's partly paper, partly strategy, partly castle defence, and
a war in arrows with 3 castles holding viewpoints. What is the
strategy? You create a nation, you defend it, you approach it an
empire the likes of HALO.
Jacob
Malewitz
Age
of Empires Win 2, Byzantium
A
Castle Siege Page, Part 1
Byzantine
in Spanish in age of empires is game. Spanish hit me with
conquistador the conquistador marks with arrow, conquistador uses
arrow by sword Byzantines quit use cataphract, the hottest cavalry
unit in the game against siege, buildings, and infantry, and a hot
move to take gold maps.
The
idea was to win on Byzantine My favorite civilization in age of
empires win 2 is Byzantine. I was planning to invade Spanish whom had
castle to build cavalry you build stables, they kill infantry and
spearmen and certain unique units in game.
t
Byzantines
use cataphract, to build cavalry you build stables and to build
cataphract you use castles. Idea is castle siege page for lighter and
bottle, off a hardcover novel.
Cataphracts
are the hottest weapon, with blades so hot and a speed so hot you can
almost beat game. Hot as Egyptians in first age of empires, who last
with chariots, who last with short sword, and can conquer all of
civilization but have a book and Empire with Pharaoh. Their army is
best kadesh. Byzantine page says the hottest Byzantine battle is
Justinian, and you should see game as win both, and that the
Egyptians are about hotted by me and that Choson and Hittite wont win
land and Egypt page like this.
Byzantines
use cataphract, but game is Egyptian in out to jacket and win of
white color for flag. I used cataphrct and arrow, and game says since
you counter hot with Byzantine you should try more to win on points
and chess pay. Threee barracks were in operation, and I was
building champisons. Are stables to beat Building arrow with
cataphract whom had to invade. I was building Spanish four stables to
beat Byzantines to invade I was building building champions with
sword.
Game
was lost by arrow. Game was played by Spanish and Mayan. The Spanish
quit and my ally quit said quit. I played the game as Byzantines,
Byzantines won arrow by sword Byzantines played Japanese a trick,
they turned.
What
is Egypt?
What
is Byzantine blade?
Who
is the Egyptian sword? Who is empire? What is short sword in
first game? What is Cataphract in second game?
Napoleon
is here. Napoleon is here. Who is operation, who is game, what is
meal, weapon, and pay for Egypt? What is book and city for Byzantium,
a castle to out.
Byzantines
played Japanese a trick. They turned. Byzantines siad they would turn
on the Japanese it was a deathmatch game. The Japanese turned on me
and hit me with arrow. Byzantines hit me hard they used cataphract
defense to play me a game against the Japanese. The Japanese turned
on me. I played the Byzantines a cataphract I used a scout.
I was playing as scout rider on vol, an open source system. Three
play. You hit them with cataphract, horse, charge a champion a
champion, Byzantines hit the Japanese hard. Scout goes with the
Japanese taken over by champion Champion is taken.
Champion
is taken unit for Vikings. It beats knight. The Vikings are good but
the Vikings are good but the Vikings never used them in game. This
was land map.
The
teuton unique unit is tuetonic arrow. The knight is heavy cavalry and
it has option of arrow. The teutons use heavy siege, such as bombard
cannnon, to attack heavy fortifications. I have used heavy siege
siege siege as advance base I would build heavy forfifications in
front, to win online game In this game I used Vikings as a play - I
wanted hun - so I used the Viking as a play for ship but I did not so
I wanted to use Viking for ship. But I did not see the land
mass they were using The game was coastal, th Arabia, then it turned
into frozen winter I wanted to ally with hun, chin-nook, and crossbow
I wanted crossbow., but the Vikings have no crossbow we used crossbow
we used halberdiers, horse archer, and catapult to attack the Chinese
I don’t like the Chinese -- they cheat in game like Korean.
We turned on Chn-nook aout of castle and they used horse archer to
end the game. Game was over. 1300. Scout Rider won 50+ for game,
1450.
Game
was lost by arrow. Game is game master guide.
Age
of Empires is a hard game, game was won hard by a fast strike for the
flank Age of empires was won on this. The Spanish quit on me. Fast
strike was for mayan, in a different game-- game went Viking-went
halbierder Game went Viking for We used halbcerdiers and scout rider
is playing against hun, tueton, and I was allied with Chinese. The
Chinese have chin-nook as unique unit Hun have horse archer.
Game
went Viking We used halberdiers and scout rider is playing against
hun, tueton, and I was allied with
Chinese.
The Chinese have Chin-nook as unique unit Hun have Tartar as unique
unit I used cavalry, horse archer, to kill Chinese chin-nook as
unique unit I turned on the Chinese and tried to ally with hun in
Loki game, this was the clan on Vol I joined because they wanted me
to up for powere and fun They wanted me to up ratings The Viking
unique unit is horse archer Why would the Vikings have horse archer
as unique unit when they have axe thrower The halberdier is another
unique unit
Game
was not over Game allowed so for Vol source We won the horse archer,
a recorderd game, and I was allowed to write about the game
-
Viking have horse archer
-Viking
have trebuchet
-Vikings
use halberder to beat cavalry sometimes players too confident with
them
-You
need to have massed army, combined army, and city protected by army
For
defence in this game I used horse archer. . .
Money
in American Sport Jacket
Shirt
Andrew Bolton Red
Jkwon
hood hop Red Hat
Egypt
Deathtch game, Sol Win
I
was in Egypt in a deathmatch game, avast, playing against Babylon, a
used source game This was not on vol Scout Rider played the ge on
1800, in an old game, but the game was won by sword I used chariot in
the game for a strong game -- Egypt lost the game early Egypt won the
game early by 3-phase you win the game by sword you win the game by
chariot and you win the game by deathmatch The deathmatch game was
won by me early I played three chariots early, for a scouting
party You win 3 chariots for a scouting party because you have to
scout for foraging and city City is winning Scout is winning The
short sword can win against shield is strong here. The sword and
spear as chariot. The chariot archer is strong -- it is my favorite
and can win against Babylonian chariot archer
The
city was protected by army The city was strong in spear and chariot
With Egypt, in age of empires, your king is pharaoh Your houses are
different, and your technology is different Your technology is sword
and gathering wood With Egypt, in age of empires, your king is
pharaoh needed an overlord, a seer, and a bringer
Your
houses are different because you need to win in game and you need to
have houses for population A pharaoh would bring more houses
Your
technology is different for game -- you would need to research it and
invest in it
The
game was won by chariot Babylon attacked and used chariot, horse
archer, and catapult.
I
attacked with elephant, chariot, and a fleet I had a fleet on the map
game game game I attacked with elephant chariot and a fleet I had a
fleet on the map The map was called overlord and lowtrdlands and
marshlands Scout rider was my alias, and this was a game who liked
hitting me on zone for deathmatch age of empires game.
Social
media is hot. Age of empires is hot. The player I played in game was
found on social media site. He had a higher ranking than me. He was
1900, Legionairre. The player, Legionnaire, called me out to another
game to win his name. He wanted to play Egyptian against me--so I
played Hittite. Hittite is hot map. Egypt and Ramses II fight Hittite
Kadesh, and win with chariot sword. The Hittites have chariot archer,
but they are weak compared to horse archer. Horse archer is hottest
unit--with catapult-- for Hittite empire.
The
horse archer is weak, unless you protect it with a retreat form or a
mass of infantry The mass infantry is strong for catapult Catapult
protection. Hittite is strong with horse archer In game, and in
history, they have money and power They are strong in catapult and
can conquer city. Hittite is the conqueror of empires. Egypt is
hotter because it respects other empires and can conquer easier in
this sense. Egypt is undervalued early history, then is approached
for millenia for how and why you run empires with ideas of different
monarch standards.
Game
is here. Egypt is hottest map.
The
best reasons to use Hittites--
They
have strong catapult
Horse
archer can be used for scouting and can raid city.
In
DM game they can beat Choson, early Korean empire, have strongest
light sword.
Social
media is hot. Social media says next game should take next name,
early buy of something, and win something. It’s short story idea.
Age of empires would say game is hot, but Civilization is early game
it bases some moves on. Who is publisher, who is page, what is win of
history book to you then a similar page like this. Do you show moves
this hot? Yes, writer myth is you lose your move.
n
Scout
Rider is best name. Prototype on a blog might say meal, jacket, pay
of game.
Scout
rider is not as hot as other names. Early idea on zone is, Zacko The
Great is hottest dm player then you have real map players with other
hot scores. Early articles on this site helped me understand Hittite
and Choson are hot on DM, but I wanted to try a hot different
civilization for game, like I did Greeks and Egypt in Civilization 1
and 2.
Does
this buy you AOE 2 for Byzantium game? Where is Rome? Who is general
other than you’d see in Age of Empires.
Game
is here. Egypt is hottest civ.
What
Hittites might lack:
They
have no long sword like Choson
They
cant king chariot or heroes like Egypt.
The
Hittites are never allowed technology--the game fast.
I
hit him with horse archer fast. The horse archer is a fast unit in
any map. I used it to bring Legionairres city to Egypt, in a rush,
but was countered by his rush.
Horse
archer hit the rear of his city.
It
had:
Farm
House
Town
Center
The
farms were unprotected, they had villagers, and I was was able to
wipe out empire. I hit his houses next--but he had a army. The army
went into his TC, (town center), and pushed army away.
“Military:
The
best military units of Egypt are their Chariots and CAs with +33 %
hitpoints and Nobility who get all upgrades (and their Priests with
all technologies). They should balance the poor infantry (nothing
beyond the Short Swordsman) and siege weapons (only STs).
The
infantry is pretty awful - only Short Swordsmen and without piercing
armour. But then Egypt can do without infantry from Bronze onwards -
so who cares? There are good Slingers with most Iron Age upgrades,
but no Siegecraft and no extra shielding. The Academy is bad too -
again: Egypt doesn't need infantry so who cares?
The
archery is good with full range and all technologies including Chain
Mail - Egypt only doesn't get the Horse Archer - well, it can convert
them, no problem.
Egypt
doesn't get any Cavalry but it can convert those too. Poor siege
weapons - there are only Stone Throwers here with extra range in
Iron.
Egypt
has alhl walls and all Towers, full range and Alchemy. The navy is
nothing special but they do get everything.” AOKHEAVEN, HeavenGames
The
Egyptian hit me hard. He had chariot in his city. I raided him again.
I added chariot. The chariot is a strong unit for Egyptian, with its
ability to use both chariot archer and chariot sword. It’s not
expensive unit in game, but in past the best weapon on the
battlefield.
The
chariot is a strong unit for Hittite. In ancient history, the
Egyptians and Hittites did fight. What is the fght, for empire, for
Arabia, for Babylon, and for Kadesh. In move, Ramses II takes Egypt
to the Sinai, and wins Jordan and most of the Arabian peninsula, then
his holdings in Kadesh lose. The battle is there, and a win for the
Egyptian Pharaoh and his empire.
The
catapult is a powerful siege weapon in Age of Empires. I used the
catapult to attack his city next.
--I
built a forward base.
--I
used a catapult
--I
used the horse archer
--I
used light cavalry
I
started hitting his forward base. His forward base had: siege,
stable, farm, and town center. The Eg yptt ians --
Legionairre--hit me again. He let me hit his city and I did not see
his army I destroyed his city. And I did not see his army. I
destroyed his city but he was prepared I hit him with arrow I hit him
with sword I hit his city with a legion of men and I hit him with a
catapult. I he Egypt in game? Why does he want my civilization?
Is he copying me on a move? As a mountain biker and short story
writer, you might say, odds are he wants to take moves on me on pay.
In game, rushers do this; in game, a rusher can turn into the
worst or best gamer with a strategy wrong.
Flank.
Is that better? Did Wellington copy napoleon? Did Caesar copy
Augustus? Did Scipio beat Hannibal? Would you say, playing Egypt, is
this Civilization the best out, the most copied, and the one you
should glory more? That is the age of empires 600 philosophy.
Il
b saw his forward base
I
saw his 2nd city
My
city was hit by another Egyptian.
Nubians
are rich, and Egypts rich, but won’t lose to flank easy, and can
take a southern front hot like Ramses II in Jordan right before
Kadesh. Ramses has other wins; flanks and wins of war only? No, but
he is there hottest commander, holder of a king line from Thebes
saying, yes, but we create the next civilization, the next empire,
and can take all of asia off you Persian Elephants.
I
used light cavalry, wind riders with the idea of empire to them, by a
king you can’t beat in game unless you hero Tutankahmen. I uxec
catapult, hot players for Egypt game but not as hot as the Hittite
catapult. I used light cavalry and catapult to attarm with
strong army. This was my strategy in another game, Battletech.
Battletech was strong in strategy--it had MechWarrior, a shooter game
on plains like isle, but it had no strategy role playing game for pc
like age of empires. Look, you might make me wrong. Look, you’d see
other game books on it that can show pay and a cool, like Eve tech or
Robotech. And in my case, strategy folder is hot.
The
strategy was to hit their base. Rift says, pay is 220 for your game,
on novel buy. That is the cool for the drink and your red shirt. The
strategy hit me hard: scout rider wanted to hit base Egypt, the
opponent, in game, and Battletech wanted to hit base with two mech, 7
mech would retreat, then I would be able to build forward base.
Another
strategy I would use in Battletech and now Eve: I would hit their
base with light and assault army: I would never use medium army The
medium army would be the unique unit in the game.
In
another game called civilization I would retreat and attack. Then I
would flank with cavalry; my hottest move napoloeon is a win here,
and brits lose because they lose to navy. Cavalry flank is easy: jump
right, jump left, but always take a western point or high ground.
Once you do that, build army, and try to militarize your city with
something. I can siege: siege would mean you, take high ground next,
then take out army in advance, then you can beat army with siege.
Avengers
Dark Siege 100
--------------------------
Caleb
Carr The Alienist 200
The
Fifth Profession David Morrell, 5 Dr Pepper, Duane, Cable tea 200
The
Siege of Faltara Arsen Darnay – 200, age of empires 600
Shadow
Moon, George Lucas and Chris Claremont – X-Men 10,000
---
2 book, 2 meal, 2 long john, two comic, two monster, two Ran Dynasty
Written novels – 500 mill red lighter and yellow pharaoh.
What
is Egypt for Warcraft?
Merger,
Merger, Merger – What is Manifest Destiny on Cell, 2,000
Sanjay Sanghoee Diablo or Steven F- Erikson bone garden and inferno
room 2000 lighter and short story for pack.
Glass
orbit – blue shirt – Glass Orbit – Egypt pay 1,000 year to one
cigarette for free country orange jacket on a 100 red jacket for
Civilization Empires 10 10 100.
Feast
of Souls – 2,000 Amber Chronicles –
Andrew
Bolton page – crime comics, crime novels, what is genre for brand
maximization, The Lion Score Short Story for Saturn Spec and
Speculative Fiction Author RA Salvatore
Bolden,
or Bolton, Bolden Anthony, Bolton Andrew
What
is buy of brand page? Little Saigon, Wind Mount, Wind Riders, Pharaoh
1st Age, Egypt Age of Kings 1st Dynasty? Ran Dynansty for Shantarum
Burn
Season John Lantigua – Bourne Conspiracy or Ludlum Conspiracies.
Fringe Book is Manifest Destiny.
Sword
of Lankhmar – 100 next buy.
Raymond
E Feist. Raymond E Feist. Raymond E. Feist. Academy, Reebok, Free
Country, Bolton.
Red
Shirt or Blue Shirt. Red Jacket or Orange Color.
Orange
Presence book and buy is what?
4 4
4 4 15 books fantasy novels on buy and write dragonlance comic. 13
From
Civilization to Age of Empires -- A Short History of Strategy Games
Computer
strategy games like Civilization, Age of Empires, and Warcraft, are
known to those familiar with the genres. However, there are plenty of
unknowns in the field of computer strategy games that should get more
exposure. On the other hand, Civilization is little known to many
players: most go with the Playstation or X-Box games.
I have a
deep joy for strategy games and, in a sense, a bitter hatred for them
taking so much from my early childhood. I would spend far to many
hours trying to conquer the world. I still play -- and too much --
but they are fun -- and I Can write about them.
RPGs
like Everquest and FPS like Halo dominate the consoles, but strategy
games have no success in those fields; you need a computer to enjoy
them most. This is similar to Halo. I enjoy Playstation games, but
strategy is better. If you want a shooter, such as Doom, you can get
it on a PC: Halo went his way, so did Crysis.
While
Civilization was far from the first strategy game to have worldwide
success, it did play an integral part in the development of a loyal
fan base. It was created by the gaming genius Sid Meier.
Games
like Risk and Chess were the precursors to the strategy games of
today and, even in the early years of gaming, could be played on your
computer.
What
was lacking in these time honored games was the fact they didn't
utilize what a computer could do. Civilization has always had one of
the better Computer AIs. There were some stark comparisons: the best
strategy games, like the best board games, are infinitely replayable.
Every game could be a different world with different opponents.
Civilization
was a game with two options, either conquer the world or reach Alpha
Centauri first. Those were the goals, but governing an entire
civilization was what made it work. War. Politics. Trade. Science.
You could pick from over a dozen civilizations, from the Romans to
the Greeks, the Mongols to the Chinese. All these things were
involved in the game. All these things made it highly addictive.
And
it wasn't just about graphics, those would be improved in later
versions, and different types of games like Warcraft.showed what
could be done with graphics. Age of Empires would use Speed, much
like Warcraft, but you would have to mark resources in different
ways. You would need gold, wood, food, stone, and sometimes even
fish.
Strategy was paramount; guide your civilization from the
stone age to the modern age. Sometimes you would have to get out of
the game, play a new one, and start winning. I could win sometimes,
but sometimes the computer outplays you, and this is a hard Chess
game.
Civilization 2 could be the finest strategy game, not to
mention sequel, ever made. It incorporated far superior graphics with
new takes on the first Civilization. I played Civilization 2 more
than any other game in my entire life. I would rise early just to
play the game more.
Soon, other games came into the
background.
Colonization was another Sid Meier game that
focused on the years of colonizing the Americas. You had less options
for civilizations, but it was like taking a small portion of a book
and making it into a short story where you could focus on one single
point in time. The graphics on this game, and the first Civilization,
are very outdated, but I would recommend it.
Master
of Orion 2 was perhaps the best of the old galactic games. From what
I've read, the third game in the series was far inferior to the
second. Master of Orion was like Civilization in space, where
decisions were made, war a constant, and spreading your civilization
important. A recent game has come close to defeating Master of Orion.
Galactic Civilizations succeeded in making an excellent turn based
strategy game, as well as a good sequel. Both Orion and Galactic are
similar, and could be recommended, but there is one old game that
merits a look.
Ascendancy
came out over a decade ago. I bought it for a reasonable price, still
hot from my addiction to Master of Orion. Ascendancy really surprised
me and, though it wasn't perfect, came close to defeating Master of
Orion. The amount of micro-management grew the more your civilization
went; yet things like creating a civilizations characteristics make
it an excellent older game.
I
still wanted to live in the real world. I bought Civilization 3 and
was very disappointed; the graphics were better, but it just didn't
look good next to Civilization 2.
Warcraft
and Age of Empires are the two best real time strategy games around.
I
had played Warcraft 2 some years before. While many know World of
Warcraft - which I never played - there are just as many fans of the
strategy game. What really made Warcraft work was the story behind
it. Straight out of a world similar to Middle Earth (Tolkien's Lord
of the Rings), came a new take on Humans and Orcs. The setting was
medieval, yet magic was also incorporated. I was exasperated with
Warcraft 2 for a long time, and though it wasn't as addictive as
Civilization, the graphics and videos were superb.
Warcraft
3 I wouldn't have played nearly as much had I not become addicted to
the Blizzard online gaming. This was incredible; replayability for
Warcraft was doubled.
The
first game I ever played online was Age of Empires. The first two
games of the series weren't necessarily superor to Warcraft, but, I
liked to play in the real world more than with magic. I have yet to
play Age of Empires 3 due to poor reviews, but the first two games in
the series kept me at the computer for days.
The
first time I played Age of Empires I was reminded of its RTS
competitor Warcraft. Warcraft is very similar to Empires. Set in
ancient times with soldiers like Centurions and Horse Archers, the
game differs from Civilization in that, like Warcraft, you have
missions instead of playing a single game vying for power of the
world.
Still,
the game wouldn't have been half as good had I not connected to the
internet and started playing others. Like Warcraft, when playing
online scores can be improved by winning and this makes it a very
competitive environment.
The
sequel to Age of Empires, Age of Kings, improved on the game in many
aspects: it was set during the medieval era, was easier to
micromanage, and had very good graphics. Unlike Civilization, each
different civilization had unique characteristics: The Franks have
strong cavalry while the Mayans have no cavalry at all.
I'm
sure I've missed some major gaming moments in this discussion. It's
odd that the game I like the least, Warcraft 3, was really better
than Civilization 3 and Age of Empires 3.
Command
and Conquer was also a very good game, but, in terms of the top three
strategy games, it doesn't fit in with what I want in terms of
interesting replayabilility.
There
are other strategy games I would like to look at if I ever get the
chance. I have recently found good reviews of the game Homeworld.
In
another article, I will document the rise of the First Person
Shooter. Gamers should find that article enlightening, though I won't
lie that strategy games are it for me.
